Artist: DSNY Album: DSNY 2005 Vol. 4 Year: 2005 Bitrate: 128kbps Tracklist 1 - Just Walking 2 - Loote La 3 - Teri Kurti 4 - Chanana Nache 5 - Bawra Bawra 6 - Sona Ve Ghar A Jaye.mp3 7 - Yaar Ko Maine 8 - Tuba Tuba 9 - Ek Dil Ruba Hai 10 - Dewani 11 - Miraksam 12 - Woh Lamhe Hidden Content: Please reply with 'Thanks' to view the hidden content. You can upgrade your account to VIP to remove this restriction.
I only liked the song "Woh Lamhe". I enhanced it with Ozone 11. Let me know what you think and if it made any difference in sound quality? DSNY 2005 Vol. 4 - Woh Lamhe - https://sharedby.blomp.com/6sH8tl it is the same thing. there is no difference Try this - https://sharedby.blomp.com/6sH8tl So its not louder? When I enhance it, it raised the equalizer, Impact, Imager, Clarity, Stabilizer, Dynamic EQ & Maximizer. Maximizer like 11.9 dB. In my stereo its loud and sound way better than original. I don't usually look at the chart, just hear the difference. Not sure why its sounding same to you. Well I never looked at the chart, just compared the 2 audios side by side with same volume level. Will try the chart next time and see if it makes any difference. Thanks for the input. Ok, here it is..... Original - https://easyupload.io/jd1ndf WMA Enhance @ 441 - https://easyupload.io/sy6973 FLAC Enhance 2118Kbps - https://easyupload.io/be1rug I might have to mess around with the settings in the program. Because when you upload a mp3 to the device, it brings it in Wav file as production and it is very big amount of space it takes. I understand the graph is showing it is not good as the original but it is enhancing the song very much. There is a huge difference in sound quality in terms of graph. The confusion here is something I am doing at my end or maybe I don't understand it well and have to learn more about it. But as far as low quality mp3, it is a computer format doesn't matter if its flac or HD quality. It can be changed with programs out there. I still don't understand, if its doing all these features in the production, how come its still a low file? Check below link of enhancements. There is a reason why these programs are made so it brings low quality sound to high quality. https://www.izotope.com/en/products/ozone/features.html Its not low quality bro. Firstly I still have to learn more about the program. I downloaded the "Spek" audio analyzer and no matter which format I save it in Adobe Audition, it shows the same. I don't know why the peak is not going up. So maybe I have to play around the settings in there. But one thing I still don't understand is, instead of looking into the chart, what about the hearing part? Is it louder? More Bassier? Trebblier? Anything? Maybe this audio is not a good way but regular 90s hindi songs, you can hear quite a difference. Alright, thanks for the input. The experiment continues.....will get back once I figure it out. Just downloaded the latest Adobe Audition 2023 and its same no matter which file I save it to. So it turns out, if I get a crappy mp3, which is this original file, the graph will stay as it is. However, as far as the music goes, it is up to the listener how they enjoy the music. Somehow the original file is very low in my speakers so had to tweak it up and sounds good now. You do realize the original is in MONO, not STEREO. But then again, there are more ways to improve it and this is just a sample. Send me a file you like and lets see if it makes any difference. You tell me what is wrong with it and what you trying to add into it. Maybe I can suite it to your likeness and we can go from there.....
if you take an audio file 128kbps and convert it to 320kbps it won't increase the High quality this is your convert from Dylan101 post this is from from Dylan101 post high quality audio should look like this you didn't get it, you can convert CD to High Definition and get this quality Rip but when you convert low quality like 128kbps to whatever format Kbps this is the result long story short, the audio analyzer is still showing low quality well maybe you still live in the 90s We don't need you to convert audio here, just post it as it is and add the audio quality info along with the post!
You should see when you invert the phase if they files nullify, then you would know whether you enhanced it or not. You would also know what was changed. If you upload both files I can drop the null test file and you can see for yourself. You basically just raised the volume on this. It added a limiter and compressed the shit out of the 'enhanced' version. The original MP3 sounds way better because it has quiet parts, the enhanced version has no quiet parts. In audio we perceive louder sounds to be better. If you want to make this better, you have to go in a manual EQ, compress, and then limit it. You should have a reference track for what you want it to sound like then try to match it. The only way you can meet my standards is to download the original tracks, and remix them yourself. Then export that remix as lossless file. Btw, a lot of older music is Mono. Most large club systems only run mono.
